I'm not a scientist however like you I can read, I can look at the world around me, and I can clearly and logically think for myself.
I previously accepted at face value the theory of molecules-to-man evolution.
In my transition from agnostic to Christian, I looked at both sides of the issue for several years, with objectively and skepticism. I saw there was sufficient room for doubt in evolutionary theory to allow the possibility of a creator God.
I needed to find the truth for myself, and only God could reveal it to me.
Coming to know the truth of the Bible and our true origins is a personal journey and significantly, a spiritual journey. If I hadn't accepted the possibility of a spiritual/supernatural dimension then I simply would not have found God.
To me, the whole creation vs. evolution debate is secondary or subsidiary to the overarching issue of theism vs. atheism. Does God exist or not? That is the question I needed to ask and answer for myself.
I came from agnosticism to accept the existence of the God of the Bible (i.e. theism as distinct from deism) so now I look at the issue differently. I ask different questions, such as: "ok, so God created us; how? when? why?" and "why did God make it difficult to reconcile belief in a Biblical recent creation with modern scientific theory?"
I looked at the evolutionary science and saw enough room in which to fit God. Many have come to know God from this starting point. I don't have all the answers, but I don't need all the answers. I can keep an open mind, keep searching, but once I knew that God exists, it was a matter of how, when, why etc... not if.
I don't need to be immersed in the quagmire of the scientific "debate".
I can simply go to the Bible and have God reveal the truth to me.
Most scientists appear to accept evolution as fact and present it as fact.
The fact is, molecules-to-man evolution (Darwinian, neo-Darwinian etc.) has not been proven to be fact.
Neither has Biblical creation proven to be fact.
The biggest problems for me as a creationist include:
- the consistency of the newer-to-older dating results of the rocks as you go down the geologic column.
- the consistency of big numbers from radiometric dating methods.
- the apparent sorting of fossils from "simple" to more complex as you rise through the column.
See the creationist websites below for possible explanations.
These problems don't affect my "faith". I can't "un-know" what I know. Both sides have unanswered questions or "problems".
An outline of proposed theories for Genesis 1:1-2 is here.
Here are some links I find useful:
pro Atheistic Evolution
pro Biblical Creation
Somewhere in the middle (I think)
"HUMANS and other vertebrates evolved from a tiny sea creature resembling an eel, British and Canadian experts have confirmed.
Researchers from the University of Cambridge and the University of Toronto said today that the extinct 505 million-year-old Pikaia gracilens is the most primitive known vertebrate - making it the oldest ancestor of humans.
Co-author, Jean-Bernard Caron, said, "It’s very humbling to know that swans, snakes, bears, zebras and, incredibly, humans all share a deep history with this tiny creature no longer than my thumb."
two-inch-long, worm-like sea creature is the earliest-known animal to
have the beginnings of a backbone, Cambridge University scientists have
This makes Pikaia gracilens, which evolved more than 500 million years ago, a precursor of modern vertebrates, including humans.
Human beings, as well as fish, amphibians, birds, reptiles and mammals are all descended from this two-inch creature - Pikaia gracilens which lived in the sea 505 million years ago."
"HUMANS and gorillas last shared a common ancestor 10 million years ago, according to an analysis of the first full sequence of the gorilla genome. The gorilla is the last of the living great apes - humans, chimpanzees, gorillas and orang-utans - to have its complete genetic code catalogued."
So, my great, great, great, ....totally great grandmother or grandfather (which?) was a tiny sea creature resembling an eel...or a worm?
And I am one of the living great apes, related by ancestry to my distant cousins the chimpanzees, gorillas and orang-utans, along with swans, snakes,......?
I know that I am not descended from a worm, and I know that I am not related to a gorilla.
"In a remarkably rapid display of evolution at work,..."
actually Natural selection at work.
They’re still 100% cockroaches, aren’t they?
Yes, a creationist cliche, however...aren’t they?
A classic example of the fact of natural selection being used to support the fancy of atoms to Adam evolution.
Jaw-inspiring: Ancient fish was pivotal in evolution of face, researchers find
"When you look at Romundina, it's like looking at yourself in the mirror, but with a 415 million-year-old image.It's like in a science-fiction movie. You look at the mirror, but it's not you. It's your ancestor." Vincent Dupret of Uppsala.
"The face is one of the most important and emotionally significant parts of our anatomy, so it is interesting to understand how it came into being"
Per Ahlberg, an expert in vertebrate evolution at Uppsala University in Sweden
World's oldest sperm found in Australian fossil
The world's oldest and best preserved sperm has been discovered in 17 million-year-old fossils unearthed in far north Queensland.
(Read the full article to get the full picture).